Seán O Sullivan is a writer and curator whose work focuses on the politics and preservation of localities. He has curated projects and written critical texts dealing with community, ecology and the bonds between people and places. He holds an MA and a BA in Visual Arts Practices from IADT, Dún Laoghaire. He is a former chair of Black Church Print Studio, Dublin. He is Visual Arts Adviser to the Arts Council of Ireland / An Comhairle Ealaíon.
This page: A review of Mike Nelson’s 2000 artwork, The Coral Reef, which exhibited in Tate Britain in 2010, written by Seán O Sullivan.
Mike Nelson’s The Coral Reef is currently on display at Tate Britain as part of the institution’s collections programme. The artwork, a dilapidated warren of thin corridors and fifteen rooms, was constructed in 1999 and exhibited at Matt’s Gallery, in the East End of London a year later. The artist staked a re-enactment of atypical twentieth century liminal spaces with his labyrinthine architectural project. In his words, the installation “referred to an idea of an ocean surface, a prevalent ideology under which a coral reef or a complex and fragile structure of different belief systems existed – so in a sense each room is indicative of a different belief system.”1
The Coral Reef made a real impact in 2000, prompting the first of Nelson’s two Turner Prize nominations. In respect of which, there is a caveat to this essay – I am not convinced that Nelson’s individual effort can be viewed impartially today. Its study on the darkest histories of the late twentieth century and the relationships between the objectification and the language of idolatry, drugs, poverty, alcoholism and crime are already in some renown. By mere virtue of The Coral Reef’s presence in Tate’s permanent collection, the piece has shown its widespread critical consensus, wherein even the most cursory research reveals descriptions of “blatantly one of the true masterpieces of British art.”2
Therefore, what is the value of the Tate’s re-staging of Nelson’s work, or particularly, what is the new value of re-staging it now? The work is primarily an assessment of the effect of belief systems as they are lived on the margins of one, much larger, system. That is to say, that Nelson’s full-throated interest is devoted to an examination of the sort of person who is left out of the hierarchy of capitalism – he incisively observed his own desire for viewers to feel ‘lost in a world of lost people’.3 That the work predates 9/11, 7/7 and the 2008 Financial Crisis serves it particularly well. When Matt’s Gallery originally staged The Coral Reef in January of 2000, the world was a different place. It would have been impossible to envision then, how a series of near-empty rooms could so accurately delineate the assault that capitalist hierarchy has both endured and made on this century.
The Tate has presented the work in as private a setting as possible. Standing in the gallery corridor, an attendant ensures that only ten people enter the artwork at any one time. The viewer travels from an improvised gallery reception area to the back entrance of a minicab depot, replete with a few tacky Islamic wall hangings. The Coral Reef trades heavily from an enforced disorientation, corridors double over, lights flicker, and some rooms offer three exits. The environment’s silence is occasionally punctuated as other people make their way through its far off junctions. Nelson has worked to ensure that the viewer feels like each room would constitute a restricted space in normal life; he explains, “Everybody likes to trespass into spaces they are not meant to go into.”4
Crucially, one of the rooms is a makeshift gallery reception area. That each room is ascribed a belief system should give the viewer reason to pause and to reconsider the self-imagined position of impartial objectivity, which in turn is similar to the inability of the artwork’s invisible inhabitants to accurately envisage the consequences of their respective belief systems. Nelson is distinctly including informed viewers into his coral reef of fragile structures.
The rapid alternation between rooms uncovers the most considered aspect of The Coral Reef – each assemblage refers to a marker of twentieth century misery. A shop front area features a cloth hanging and commemorative plate with likenesses of John F. Kennedy alongside a framed photograph of a stealth bomber. In another room, two flickering security monitors sit on a makeshift desk alongside some aged electronic equipment. One particularly upsetting cubbyhole simply has a sleeping bag on the floor, with three planks of wood as its mattress. There is also a harshly lit room, painted blue and empty except for a broken chair, two unremarkable wall hangings and a ceiling fan. The fan’s rotation constantly shakes its own fixtures.
The artist is intoning that the system presumably hopes that by capturing the ideologies that bloat from its own borders, it can integrate them into its larger superstructure – or to look upon this dilemma another way, that people hurt by capitalism should simply find a way to accept it more painlessly. The Coral Reef provides a strong insight into how the abstract notions of capitalist life infringe on the concrete concerns of people who exist in its towns and cities, but live in a state of removal from its mantra.
Enjoyably enough, Nelson is hardly able to take his own point seriously, and frequently endeavours into fantasy – on the counter of one of his rooms is a makeshift tommy gun and a rubber clown mask. The gun and mask have an overtly cartoonish quality; there is no coincidence that they are presented alongside a poster advocating marijuana as an alternative to drunk driving. The Coral Reef is offering the notion that these ‘clownish’ things are all implicated into a broader mechanism of distinctly un-capitalist pursuits.
The Coral Reef, typical to the artist’s oeuvre, presents an on-going dialectic of escape and contagion coupled with a refusal to make any narrative solid or overt, nor any element didactic, symbolic or illustrative.5
One of the most surprising aspects of the entire construction comes much later in its exploration. Having gotten properly lost, the viewer will seek out the tacky minicab depot that served as the artwork’s original entrance, and having found and exited through it, will not find Tate Britain, but a storeroom for some skips, planks and rubbish. The viewer could construe two of the work’s rooms as final. The first is a bare white room that only offers a scratched, locked door. The second is this exit into the wrong place – which itself prompts a return to the warren in search of a repeat visitation to the small minicab depot. The artist painstakingly reproduced the depot twice to achieve this effect.
Each reproduction of a twentieth century non-place feels accurate, Nelson broadly implicates the sharp corners of what he sees as social culture into approximations of fantasy and reality, but refuses to provide an explicit narrative to their larger symphony. He presents capitalism as a ferocious actuality, and imparts a feeling that the function of exemplary Western living does not want to, nor will it ideologically relent to other hierarchies.